All posts tagged case summaries

May 2017 Ediscovery Case Summaries

The Court Denies the Plaintiff’s Patently Overbroad Discovery Requests
Rockwell Med., Inc. v. Richmond Bros., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57313 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 14, 2017)

Court “Rather Reluctantly” Intervenes in Discovery Dispute, Prefers the Use of TAR Before Culling by Search Terms
FCA US LLC v. Cummins, Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45212 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2017)

Sanctions Decision Generates “Considerable Heat” and Split of Authority; Supreme Court Ultimately Reverses $2.7 Million Award
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger, 137 S. Ct. 1178 (Apr. 18, 2017)

Dialing the Wrong Number Has Its Consequences: Court Grants Motion to Compel Against Debt Collector
Meredith v. United Collection Bureau, Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56783 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 13, 2017)

Hold the Phone: No Sanctions for Destroyed ESI When Content Is Unknown and Other Routes to Discover ESI Are Available
Zamora v. Stellar Mgmt. Grp., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55361 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 11, 2017)

April 2017 Ediscovery Case Summaries

Seller’s Remorse: Court Imposes Sanctions for Failure to Preserve ESI in Sale of Business
ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan Bd. of Trs. v. Connecticut Gen. Life. Ins. Co., 2017 WL 345988 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2017)

Court Acts Under Its Own Power to Impose Sanctions for Intentional ESI Spoliation
Hsueh v. N.Y. State Dep’t of Fin. Servs., 2017 WL 1194706 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2017)

Hold the Pepperoni: “Menacing Scourge” of Boilerplate Responses Leaves a Rancid Taste in Judge’s Mouth
Liguria Foods, Inc. v. Griffith Labs., Inc., 2017 WL 976626 (N.D. Iowa March 13, 2017)

Angie’s List Receives a Negative Review: Court Compels Production of ESI
Williams v. Angie’s List, Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54270 (S.D. Ind. Apr. 10, 2017)

Court Finds That “Form Over Substance” Does Not Satisfy Motion to Compel Production of ESI
Duffy v. Lawrence Mem. Hosp., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49583 (D. Kan. Mar. 31, 2017)

March 2017 Ediscovery Case Summaries

Judge Peck Has Had Enough of “Meaningless Boilerplate Responses”
Fischer v. Forrest, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28102 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 2017)

“Unusually Deplorable” Conduct Costs Plaintiff $7 Million in Sanctions
Shawe v. Elting, 2017 Del. LEXIS 61 (Del. Feb. 13, 2017)

Ignorance of the Technology is No Excuse; Businesses Have a Duty to Ensure Confidential Information Cannot be Accessed
Harleysville Ins. Co. v. Holding Funeral Home, Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18714 (W.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2017)

California Department of Education Gets Schooled in Ediscovery Production Formats
Morgan Hill Concerned Parents Ass’n v. Cal. Dep’t of Educ., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14983 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2017)

Court Finds That “Form Over Substance” Does Not Satisfy Motion to Compel Production of ESI
Excel Enters. v. Winona PVD Coatings, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22932 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 17, 2017)

February 2017 Ediscovery Case Summaries

Court Narrows the Scope of Social Media Discovery
Scott v. United States Postal Serv., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178702 (M.D. La. Dec. 27, 2016)

Court Imposes Sanctions for Failure to Preserve Phone Call Recordings
Sec. Alarm Fin. Enters., L.P. v. Alarm Protection Tech., LLC, No. 3:13-cv-00102-SLG, 2016 WL 7115911 (D. Alaska Dec. 6, 2016)

Court Delivers a Package of Proportionality and Cooperation in Class Action
Solo v. UPS Co., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3275 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 10, 2017)

Court Schools Parties on Duty to Preserve and Finds No Act of Spoliation
Archer v. York City Sch. Dist., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178969 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 28, 2016)

“Mere Speculation” of Spoliation is Not Enough to Issue Sanctions Under Rule 37(e)
HCC Ins. Holdings, Inc. v. Flowers, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12120 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 30, 2017)

January 2017 Ediscovery Case Summaries

Failure to Preserve Interactive Website Data Held Insufficient to Impose Sanctions Under Rule 37(e)
FTC v. Directv, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176873 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2016)

Jury to Decide Issue of Intent for Spoliation
Cahill v. Dart, 2016 U.S. Dist. Lexis 166831 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 2, 2016)

Australian Court Takes Predictive Coding Down Under
McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd v. Santam Ltd & Ors (No 1),
[2016] VSC 734 (Dec. 2, 2016)

Illinois State Court Leverages Proportionality Standards in FRCP 26(b)(1) to Determine if Forensic Imaging is too Intrusive
Carlson v. Jerousek, 2016 IL App (2d) 151248 (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. 2016)

Kansas Court Rejects Proportionality Arguments and Boilerplate Objections
Duffy v. Lawrence Mem. Hosp., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176848 (D. Kan. Dec. 21, 2016)

December 2016 Ediscovery Case Summaries

Failing to Cooperate Has Negative Consequences for Party
Venturedyne, Ltd. v. Carbonyx, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157722 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 15, 2016)

Court Holds “Skepticism” Not Enough for Computer Forensic Search
Coast to Coast Eng’g Servs. v. Roop, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154758 (D. Me. Nov. 8, 2016)

Court States “Old Habits Die Hard” With the New FRCP
In re Bard IVC Filters Prods. Liab. Litig., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126448 (D. Ariz. Sept. 16, 2016)

Court Upholds High Bar for Sanctions
Richard v. Inland Dredging Co., LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134859 (W.D. La. Sept. 29, 2016)

Court Finds Lesser Sanctions of District Court Sufficient
BMG Rights Mgmt. (US) LLC v. Cox Communs., Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105981 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2016)

November 2016 Ediscovery Case Summaries

Court Declines to Compel a Party to Utilize Predictive Coding
In re Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) Prods. Liab. Litig., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144925 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2016)

No Obligation to Produce Information Outside of a Party’s Legal Right of Control
Jackson v. E-Z-Go. Div. of Textron, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146951 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 24, 2016)

Court Grants Discovery Objection that Was Stated With Specificity
Arenas v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 223, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143338 (D. Kan. Oct. 17, 2016)

Court Holds It Will Not “Micro-Manage” Ediscovery; Orders Parties to Meet and Confer about Search Terms
Pyle v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140789 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 30, 2016)

“No Emails Found” is Insufficient; Court Requires Party to Explain Steps Taken to Locate Responsive Email
Carter v. Cummings, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137118 (W.D. Wis. Oct. 3, 2016)

October 2016 Ediscovery Case Summaries

Court Clarifies that Data Must be Permanently Deleted for Sanctions
Erhart v. BofI Holding, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129906 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 21, 2016)

Court Issues a Cornucopia of Sanctions for Discovery Violations
Arrowhead Capital Fin., Ltd. v. Seven Arts Entm’t, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126545 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2016)

Court Compels Party to Identify Knowledgeable IT Personnel
Collins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135615 (D. S.D. Sept. 30, 2016)

Court Orders Party to Attempt On-Site Data Collection
Sky Med. Supply Inc. v. SCS Support Claim Servs., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121215 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2016)

Court Discusses What Constitutes Reasonable Steps for Preserving Text Messages
Shaffer v. Gaither, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118225 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2016)

September 2016 Ediscovery Case Summaries

Court Will Not Force Responding Party to Use TAR; Judge Peck Authors another Key Predictive Coding Opinion
Hyles v. New York City, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100390 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2016)

Proportionality Factors Persuade Court to Grant Motion to Compel
First Niagara Risk Mgmt. v. Folino, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106094 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2016)

Court Limits Request for Social Media to Certain Relevant Information
Baxter v. Anderson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110687 (M.D. La. Aug. 18, 2016)

Court Holds that Predictive Coding Does Not Change Discovery Standard
Dynamo Holdings Ltd. P’ship v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 2685-11, 8393-12, 2016 WL 4204067 (T.C. July 13, 2016)

Court Refuses to Compel Production of Archived Emails on Backup Tape
Elkharwily v. Franciscan Health Sys., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99795 (W.D. Wash. July 29, 2016)

August 2016 Ediscovery Case Summaries

Court Grants $3,000,000 in Punitive Damages for ESI Spoliation
GN Netcom, Inc. v. Plantronics, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93299 (D. Del. July 12, 2016)

Court Clarifies the Obligation to Utilize Rule 26(b)(1) Proportionality Factors
Rowan v. Sunflower, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72254 (D. Kan. June 2, 2016)

Court Denies U.S. Government’s Warrant to Obtain Overseas Data
Microsoft Corp. v. United States (In re Warrant to Search a Certain E-Mail Account Controlled & Maintained by Microsoft Corp.), 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12926 (2d Cir. N.Y. July 14, 2016)

Attorney Sanctioned for Failing to Address Proportionality in Brief
Fulton v. Livingston Fin. LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96825 (W.D. Wash. July 25, 2016)

“Caveat Emptor” Applies to ESI Requests
P.R. Med. Emergency Grp., Inc. v. Iglesia Episcopal Puertorriqueña, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99391 (D.P.R. July 26, 2016)

 
css.php